Thứ Ba, 17 tháng 12, 2013

Why Sales and Marketing Don’t Get Along

Why Sales and Marketing Don’t Get Along


 

Sales teams and marketing teams pursue a common objective: create customer value and drive company results. But sales and marketing don’t always get along. Certainly, all-out war between the two teams drains productivity. Yet having the two teams work in perfect harmony and reach an easy consensus on every decision is a pipedream, and in fact, is not the best answer either.

 

Some tension between sales and marketing is healthy and productive.

 

Sales-marketing tension can stem from differences in marketers’ and sellers’ perspectives. Marketers think in terms of aggregate customer segments; sellers think in terms of individual customers. Marketers design strategies; sellers implement tactics.  Marketers focus on analysis and process; sellers focus on relationships and results. These diverse perspectives often lead to conflict. For example, marketing says, “We develop thoughtful strategies that can drive sales force success, but most salespeople won’t even take the time to understand them.” Sales says, “Marketers are locked in the ivory tower. Their plans look good on paper, but don’t work with real customers.”

 

But the tension created by diverse viewpoints also has a positive side. It sparks creativity and ensures that multiple sides of issues are expressed. Sales makes certain that customer needs are addressed and that short-term company revenue goals are achieved; marketing ensures that product and customer segment strategies anticipate the evolution of longer-term customer needs. Sales pushes for competitive pricing; marketing ensures that the company uses discipline in pricing.

 

Sales-marketing tension can also stem from the co-dependence of the sales and marketing teams. Especially when things don’t go well, situations can quickly turn to finger-pointing. Marketing says “We worked hard and generated good leads for sales, but they didn’t follow up.” Sales says, “Marketing’s leads aren’t worth my time; the last lead they gave us was for a business that shut down two years ago.”

 

But the mutual dependence of sales and marketing creates a productive sense of urgency and encourages both teams to do their jobs better. Sales insists that marketing provide better leads. Marketing makes sure that sales follows up. Sales helps marketing develop strategies and sales collateral that address customer needs. Marketing urges sales to spend time strategically and implement the marketing plan.

 

Accomplishing the common objective of creating customer value and driving company results requires competency in a wide range of tasks which fall into three categories.

 •Sales tasks. Account management, personal selling, distributor management, merchandising, sales compensation design, and numerous other sales management activities typically fall within the purview of Sales.

 •Marketing tasks. Market research, competitive analysis, market segmentation, brand positioning, packaging, and dozens of other market-focused undertakings are usually the responsibility of Marketing.

 •Joint Sales/Marketing tasks. Sales strategy formulation, lead generation, sales collateral development, pricing, sales forecasting, and many other tasks frequently require the participation of both Sales and Marketing.

 

Entire books, journals, business courses, and consulting companies are dedicated to helping marketers and sellers with these tasks. Yet very little is written about how to get sales and marketing to work together to keep all of the tasks aligned around the common objective.

 

Four strategies help companies accomplish all of this work with a healthy balance of sales-marketing harmony and tension.

 1.Make sure all sales tasks to get done well. Design a high-impact sales organization, hire sellers with characteristics such as interpersonal ability and results-drive, and develop the competencies sellers need to succeed. Support the sales force with structures, processes, systems, and programs that enable sales success.

 2.Make sure all marketing tasks get done well. Design a high-impact marketing organization, hire marketers with characteristics such as analytical savvy and strategic thinking ability, and develop the competencies marketers need to succeed. Support the marketing team with structures, processes, systems, and programs that enable  marketing success.

 3.Implement processes and systems that encourage communication and collaboration. Ensure that Sales and Marketing communicate about tasks that the two teams perform independently, and collaborate around tasks that require joint effort.

 4.Create a culture that facilitates teamwork. Start with strong sales and marketing leaders who, through their words and actions, consistently reinforce a cooperative, customer-focused culture.

 

Reference to Harvard Business Review (HBR Blog Network)

Thứ Ba, 30 tháng 7, 2013

Bản Chất Của Việc Lập Kế Hoạch


Những vấn đề cốt yếu của quản lý

(Harold Koontz - Cyril Odonnell - Heinz Weihrich)

Bản Chất Của Việc Lập Kế Hoạch

 

“Chúng ta có thể làm sáng tỏ cốt lõi của công việc lập kế hoạch bằng cách xem xét  bốn khía cạnh chủ yếu của nó: sự đóng góp của nó đối với mục đích và các mục tiêu, sự ưu tiên cho nó trong số các nhiệm vụ của người quản lý, tính phổ biến của nó, và tính hiệu quả của các kế hoạch.”

 

  • Sự đóng góp của việc lập kế hoạch vào việc thực hiện mục đích và các mục tiêu.

Mục đích của tất cả các kế hoạch và những kế hoạch phụ trợ cho nó là nhằm hoàn thành những mục đích và mục tiêu của cơ sở. Nguyên lý nầy xuất phát từ bản chất của một cơ sở có tổ chức, mà nó tồn tại để thực hiện mục đích chung thông qua sự hợp tác có cân nhắc kỹ càng.



  • Sự ưu tiên cho vệc lập kế hoạch.

Do những hoạt động quản lý về mặt tổ chức, biên chế, lãnh đạo và kiểm tra được thiết lập để hỗ trợ cho việc lập kế hoạch hoàn thành các mục tiêu của cơ sở, cho nên về mặt logic, việc lập kế hoạch sẽ đi trước việc thực hiện toàn bộ các chức năng quản lý khác. Mặc dầu trong thực tế mọi chức năng liên hệ mật thiết với tư cách là một hệ  thống hành động, nhưng việc lập kế hoạch là công việc duy nhất có liên quan tới việc thiết lập các mục tiêu cần thiết cho sự phấn đấu của cả tập thể. Ngoài ra một người quản lý cần phải lập kế hoạch để biết loại quan hệ tổ chức nào, và chất lượng nhân viên nào là cần thiết, các chi nhánh cần phải được chỉ đạo theo đường lối nào, và cần phải áp dụng phương pháp kiểm tra nào. Tất nhiên, tất cà các chức năng quản lý khác cũng phải được lập kế hoạch nếu muốn chúng có hiệu quả.

            Lập kế hoạch và kiểm tra là những công việc không thể tách biệt  người anh em kiểu Xiam của quản lý. Một việc làm không có kế hoạch thì không thể kiểm tra được, vì kiểm tra có nghĩa là giữ các hoạt động theo đúng tiến trình bằng cách điều chỉnh các sai lệch so với kế hoạch. Mọi ý định kiểm tra mà không có kế hoạch điều vô nghĩa, bởi vì không có một cách thức nào để người ta có thể nói xem họ có đang đi tới nơi họ muốn hay không (tức là kết quả của nhiệm vụ kiểm tra) nếu như trước hết họ không biết họ muốn đi đâu (một phần trong nhiệm vụ lập kế hoạch). Như vậy các kế hoạch cung cấp cho ta các tiêu chuẩn kiểm tra.



  • Tính phổ biến của việc lập kế hoạch.

Lập kế hoạch là một chức năng của tất cả các nhà quản lý, mặc dầu tính chất và phạm vi của việc lập kế hoạch khác nhau đối với  từng cấp quản lý và với loại chính sách và kế hoạch do các cấp cao hơn quy định. Rõ ràng không thể giới hạn các công việc của người quản lý để cho họ có thể thực hiện không cần suy xét, và nếu như họ không có một trách nhiệm nào đó về kế hoạch thì thật sự họ không phải là nhà quản lý nữa.

Nếu ghi nhận tính phổ biến của kế hoạch, chúng ta sẽ dễ dàng hiểu tại sao một số người phân biệt giữa việc làm chính sách (đưa ra các hướng dẫn để ra quyết định) với công việc hành chính, hoặc giữa “người quản lý” với “nhà hành chính”  hay “người quản trị” . Do quyền hạn hoặc vị trí của mình trong tổ chức, nhà quản lý này có thể lập kế hoạch nhiều hơn – hoặc làm kế hoạch quan trọng hơn – nhà quản lý khác, hoặc kế hoạch của nhà quản lý này có thể cơ bản hơn và dễ áp dụng đối với một phần lớn hơn của cơ sở, so với kế hoạch của nhà quản lý khác. Tuy nhiên, tất cả những người quản lý đều phải làm kế hoạch từ chủ tịch công ty tới người quản lý ở cấp thấp nhất. Cho dù là một cá thể kinh doanh hay dịch vụ đến người tổ trưởng sản xuất đều phải lập kế hoạch trong một phạm vi giới hạn và tuân theo những quy tắc và thủ tục chặc chẽ. Thật thú vị là khi tìm hiểu về sự thỏa mãn trong công việc, thì một yếu tố cơ bản cắt nghĩa cho sự thành công của những người quản lý ở cấp thấp nhất trong một cơ sở là khả năng của họ để làm kế hoạch.     



  • Tính hiệu quả của kế hoạch.

Chúng ta đo tính hiệu quả của một kế hoạch bằng sự đóng góp của nó vào mục đích và các mục tiêu của chúng ta, so với các chi phí và các yếu tố khác cần thiết để lập ra và thực hiện kế hoạch. Một kế hoạch có thể tăng cường việc đạt được các mục tiêu, nhưng với chi phí quá cao  không cần thiết. Các kế hoạch là hiệu quả nếu chúng đạt được các mục tiêu đề ra với chi phí hợp lý, khi mà chi phí được đo không phải chỉ bằng thời gian, tiền của hay sản phẩm mà còn bằng mức độ thỏa mãn của  cá nhân hay tập thể.

Thứ Bảy, 24 tháng 11, 2012

Reference to Under the table fees burden businesses written by Pham Huyen on Vietnamnet

Last update 25/11/2012 10:00:00 (GMT+7)


Under the table fees burden businesses
VietNamNet Bridge – Sixty three percent of enterprises said they always have to pay under the table fee to state officials in order to expedite their administrative procedures.



The government inspectors and the World Bank have held a press conference releasing the result of the social survey on embezzlement. The survey has found out that most businesses have to pave their way with underground fees and gifts to state officials.

The survey was conducted in February – April of 2012 on 2601 people, 1058 enterprises in 10 provinces and cities, including Hanoi and HCM City, and 1901 officials from five ministries.

Envelops and gifts make businesses’ success

Money and gifts have become the popular means for enterprises and people to expedite their works when they have to deal with state officials.

The polled enterprises and people said that state officials always put difficulties for them, which force them to give bribery in order to have the works done more quickly.

Businessmen not only have to pay underground fees on the spot, but they also have to maintain long term relations with state officials by giving gifts regularly on special occasions.

Inspectors have found out that 63 percent of businesses said state officials deliberately drag out works, while 29 percent of people said they give briberies because if they don’t, their works cannot go smoothly.

Among the polled state officials, 22 percent of officials said they once saw their colleagues deliberately putting big difficulties for businessmen and people to clamor for underground fees.

37 percent of people said they would give money immediately if they get troubles at state agencies, while 59 percent of businesses said they would only give briberies if they do not have other choices to have their works fulfilled.

Paying unofficial fees to expedite works has become a popular unwritten rule in the Vietnamese community. 63 percent of enterprises and 53 percent of people have confirmed this.

Giving briberies make business worse

It seems that underground fee and presents to state officials can help lubricate the governments, thus helping speed up the process of dealing with paper procedures.

A lot of people said they gave briberies on their own initiative before the state officials claimed for “fees.” When asked why they did this, they said that they simply did the thing that everyone does every day. In many cases, giving money was considered just the thanksgiving behavior.

Especially, some people paid underground money even if it was not really necessary. They said that they would rather spend money than spending time waiting and following complicated procedures.

Most businesses also said they would be ready to pay money, if this is necessary for their works.

However, ironically, briberies do not help improve business result. Enterprises wrongly think that the money they spend to expedite works would be offset by the better business results.

The surveyors have found that if businesses do not give briberies for one year, their business would be improved by 0.13 percent, but if they give briberies, the business result would be better by 0.03 only. In other words, businesses would have better business performance if they say “no” to briberies.

The finding has raised a hope that businesses and people can obtain their goals by other ways than giving briberies. In other words, they can find alternative methods to have better business results, while no need to waste money on briberies.

Press agencies have been playing a very important role in the fight against corruption. More than 80 percent of businesses and state officials said in many cases, newspapers, not competent agencies, discovered embezzlement cases first.

Pham Huyen

Thứ Tư, 21 tháng 11, 2012

Unexpected Expenses or Hidden Costs


Unexpected Expenses or Hidden Costs

 

According to management performance’s specialist asserted Human resources management should be the most important followed is a financial management

 

While CFO draws up a financial planning for fiscal-year, an issue will be able to arise then organization not controlling that are an unexpected expenses or hidden costs

 

Now we are analyzing the article above-mentioned

 

As a resulted on statistic data of mine with the examined carefully from fifty businesses, it could be derived from an unexpected expense or hidden costs generated annually and which is from fifteen to thirty percent of total expenses. 

 

This issues also a difficult for every businessman; let’s make to walk around it

 

Firstly, I affirmed that the costly administrative must be autopsy or analyzed

 

It has a lot of items to spend and among of them as if administrative wage-fund, a rate of banking loans, transaction or dealing fees, and lubricant fees

 

Secondly, generated out of control costly from supply chains or competitive costs and advertising costs

 
Thirdly, exceeding overhaul expenses and a lot of repair expenditures regularly for machineries, production lines, equipments & assets   

 

How is the resolve it?

 


Thứ Sáu, 9 tháng 11, 2012

Due to necessary to restructure human resources (continued)


This article will be
 Running on a short-term planning

 

This article does not discussion the reason why businessmen preferred a short-term planning

 

A short-term planning will be very hard to manage from senior manager as follow:

 

·         Not training & prepared to replace some junior leaders or teams leader for long-term

·         Capital sources:  a short-term & small will be a lot of thorny for action plan

·         A lot more the matters as such produce, customer, competitive advantage, supply chains but should be stopped here temporarily  

 

Role of managers with a performance

 

-          Managing Director or CEO must be managed professionally for administrative, financial, marketing development, supply chains & manufacture. They will be set up action plan for every stage from strategic organizational. So, it’s difficult to draw up for short-term strategies, and also will not be able to recruit a good manager or CEO

-          Floating & fixed capital will be more seriously for operation while it’s not capacity cost to replace production line or improved continuously

 

 According to Robert Kreitner in Organizational Behavior 

Organizational Effectiveness through Continuous Improvement

THE 4P CYCLE OF CONTINUOUS IMPROVEMENT

  • People

  1. skill development
  2. motivation
  3. teamwork
  4. personal development and learning
  5. readiness to change and adopt
  6. increased personal responsibility for organizational outcomes
  7. greater self-management
  8. decreased stress

  • Processes

  1. technological advancement
  2. faster produce development and production cycle times
  3. system flexibility
  4. learner and more effective administration
  5. improved communication and information flow
  6. organizational learning
  7. participative and ethical decision making

  • Productivity

  1. reduced waste
  2. reduced rework
  3. more efficiency use of material, human, financial, and informational resources

  • Product

  1. greater customer satisfaction
  2. better quality goods and services

 

Chủ Nhật, 7 tháng 10, 2012

Due to Necessary to Restructure Human Resources

Due to Necessary to Restructure Human Resources




What reason for restructured human resources?

Almost, due to ineffective management in their organizational



Analyzing a little matter from the above-mentioned



- Until the present time, majority private business has progressed a short-term planning

- As mentioned before, almost private enterprises started with medium or small-sized enterprise and managed in a manner of family as if nepotism style.



- During businessmen spreading out has revealed some shortcoming in organic due to any particular trait as follow



Owner-control firms/Owner of a business



• Majority started with medium and small-sized

• Expanding to rapidly and associated or not corporate with foreign invested, almost keeping method nepotism style

• Their way of thinking is subjective, theirs talent have been incomparable

• They used to in disregard to opinions of team leaders & managers


To be continued
 

Thứ Tư, 16 tháng 5, 2012

Making a Brief Professional of mine

                                                       To Make A Brief

I returned from military service in1984 with a military rank as the chief of squad, during I was on service I was working as money affairs management of company. It’s first rank of management at that time.

I anticipated in a training course with regards to double-entry bookkeeping of Co-operative Union in 1984. (Presently, VINHLONG city, VINHLONG province)

December 1984, I started from participated in the team of financial inspective for the special circumstances and annually. At that time, I was checking various industries such as trading & processing wooden product, producing paper, printing industry, plastic product, tobacco industry, handicrafts. Apart from handicrafts industry, other almost was to the bad. Main point was the ineffective management conducing to the high costs and not controllable. Analyzed reports indicated that the hidden costs are the chief culprit.

January 1985, I was appointed as administer specialist of the handicrafts industry. At the same time, I was a responsible for guiding to draw the balance sheet (as entering in the account) and approved it every month from thirty-six private and co-operative businesses in the areas.

During I was working on I realized that the norm of administrative costly is unreasonable and loophole. On the other hand an important thing to bring a lot of controversy at that time which is the stipulated for administer to fixed assets & liquid assets, in my viewed which was a good regulation in spite of subsidized age, this issue will be mentioned another heading

February 1989, I was responsible for analyzing industries statistics data and reported to People’s Committee according to period a haft and annually. Based on statistics data and exchanges with businessmen from staple industries to predict a tendency development in the upcoming, then I have chance analyzed and studying staple industries as building materials, handicrafts export, processing foodstuff, mechanical, weaving and sewing, services.       
 
In order to analyze and predicted for economic prospects, I was a lot of exchanges with majority the staple industries at that time. At any ages always have multi-side difficulties and advantages. Therefore, spending at that time has given the mass of accumulation of mine